Biology-Online & DNLee5

A professional science writer is asked to write for free. She declines, the editor calls her a whore. She writes about it, her home blog network pulls her post. Twitter storm ensues. ETA: Scientific American finally gets to a keyboard to explain their censoring.

Everything is feeding into a massive ball of rage right now, but the points stand:
Biology-Online disrespects its writers for not paying them for their work, and was unbelievably unprofessional in their communication.

Trying to make it as a writer in the current era is as ridiculous with all the “We’ll pay you with exposure” or “Intern for 2 years and maybe we’ll hire you at minimum wage.” Working for free isn’t working. Biology isn’t my beat, but if it’s yours, beware: Biology-Online is not worth your effort.

Why do I say anything, when so many others have already said it? Because the practice of science is rough, figuring out which career matches the lifestyle you want to have, navigating industry-academia balances, and everything else. If we can share lessons with each other, it’s a bit easier to cope. Now you’ve been warned off a predatory site, know this isn’t considered normal or acceptable behaviour, and won’t be blindsided quite as hard if something like this happens to you.

This entry was posted in Practice of Science and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *